How my relationship with productivity changed in my 30s
Prefer to watch? Here's the video!
For a long time, I thought the problem was my job. I was working hard in corporate, doing everything I was supposed to do, and yet, on the whole didn’t feel remotely fulfilled or satisfied with my work. Not burned out exactly. Just apathetic. So I did what any overachiever does: I tried to optimize my way out of the feeling. Advocate for new projects, refine how I approach conversations with my boss, refining my task management system over the weekend.
Unsurprisingly, it didn't work. I know now, I was solving for the wrong thing. I kept asking "how do I work better to make me happier" when the situation was larger: “what if working harder isn’t the path to feeling better?”
That distinction took years to get to. Therapy helped. Coaching helped. Noticing when I encountered legitimately happy people and looking what their life looked lie also yielded interesting observations.
What I found on the other side wasn't a new productivity system. It was a different relationship with the whole concept of productivity. Which is why today we're getting into the four things that actually changed that relationship with productivity. Not productivity tips, but the mindset shifts that had to happen first.
What happened when I stopped chasing productivity in my 30s
Most of us assume the thing we've gotten wrong about productivity is the tactics. The wrong app, the wrong framework, the wrong morning routine. So we go looking for better tactics. We read the books, try the systems, rebuild the Notion dashboard, and then rebuild it again six months later when that one stops working too.
But what if the tactics were never the problem? What if the issue was further upstream, in the assumptions we never stopped to examine about what productivity is even for? Here are the four shifts that changed everything for me:
Shift 1: We've been sold a lie, and it's sneakier than you think
Most of us understand that achievement doesn’t automatically lead to satisfaction. Diving a bit deeper, we’re all generally waking up to the fact that even the elusive idea of “success” doesn’t automatically lead to satisfaction. But then what would? Doing all this questioning had me looking for what I did believe led to satisfaction and the belief that was sitting down there was that productivity itself leads to satisfaction. Not just external success, but the act of creating, producing, working hard on things that mattered to me. The logic went: if I'm being productive, I should feel good.
Well, it wasn’t working.
That belief is sneaky because it sounds almost right but also sets up a dangerous relationship with needing to be doing something and in contrast, rest. If being productive is what leads to satisfaction, then resting is counter to our happiness. Any professional athlete who has been injured by over-exercising would beg to differ. The legions of psychologists treating corporate professionals with clinical burnout would also disagree.
Think about how we talk about rest. We talk about “earning” a vacation. Hustle culture glorifies being “busy” as if it’s the path to the life we want. Prioritizing your mental health over work carries a low-grade guilt for a lot of people. Even leisure has gotten productivity-brained: we read to improve ourselves, exercise to perform better at work, meditate to be more focused. It's productivity all the way down.
One article that really cracked things open for me was The Theology of Productivity, which makes the case that as organized religion has declined, we've replaced it with productivity. We've built an entire moral framework around output. Working hard makes you a good person. Not maximizing your potential makes you a bad one. You might recognize this as hustle culture but there’s actually really interesting roots in religion and gaining access to the “promised land.” Highly recommend you read the article if you’re interested in learning more.
But in terms of what we should do about it, I'm not saying I have a clean answer to what we should be optimizing for instead. That's something I'm still working through. But the first shift was just seeing this lie I’d been sold and understanding why productivity was maybe not leading to the results I wanted. Once you observe this false bill of goods we’ve been sold, you can't really unsee it.
Shift 2: The echo chamber of self-help wasn't helping
I'll be the first to admit I was deep in the self-help genre for years. Before running Exhale, I was a confidence coach for high achieving woman and that kind of reading comes with the territory. But somewhere along the way I noticed that when something felt wrong, my first instinct was always to reach for the next popular productivity book. And those books kept pointing me back to the same framework I was trying to question.
On the other hand, when I read elsewhere — fiction, memoirs, philosophy, articles written by people in palliative care about what actually mattered to people at the end of their lives, interviews with founders who seemed genuinely happy, not just successful, and who talked about work in a completely different way than the productivity genre does — I found insights and stories of people who seemed to have both, real impact and healthy relationships and a sense of peace about it all.
What I kept noticing: the people who seemed most satisfied weren't the ones who had optimized hardest or hustled the most. They were the ones asking a totally different question. Not "how do I get more done" but "am I even working on the right things?" There's a difference between standing at an assembly line counting how many units go by and stepping back far enough to ask whether the product is worth making at all. That shift in perspective changed things for me.
The self-help genre, for all its value, tends to operate entirely within the productivity framework. It assumes the goal is to do more, better, faster, with less friction. Even the "slow down" books are usually framed as a strategy for eventually yielding more. Reading outside that world means actually encountering people who never accepted the premise.
Shift 3: It's about trade-offs, not inputs and outputs
Here's something that sounds obvious once you hear it but takes a while to actually absorb: two people can have the exact same inputs and outputs and feel completely differently about their work. Same hours. Same income. Totally different experience of whether it was worth it.
That's the trade-off question, and it's a different thing entirely from the standard productivity conversation.
I talk about this with my partner a lot. We've both had corporate careers with real trade-offs. Time away from family. Social lives that took a back seat. Earning potential that came with costs. And we've watched people in our lives make those same trade-offs and feel great about them, while others made identical choices and regretted them. Neither group is wrong. They just had different values and the merits and downsides of decisions depended on what their values were in determining how they felt about the outcome.
Most of us carry around stories about careers and income. The assumption that more money is always better, that a faster-growing business is always more desirable, that hustle now and rest later is the obvious formula. Sometimes more money comes attached to trade-offs that make it the wrong call for the specific person making it. That's not failure. That's just being honest about what you actually want.
I started Exhale partially because I had seen in my prior business what it means for your mental health to spend more of your time on work that you don’t love. At the same time, being my own boss allowed me to always be available for a friend’s call, plan visits to loved ones and be more present in key moments. I still cared about being successful but I wasn’t balls to the wall for success at all costs. I was careful of my tradeoffs.
That realization led to the insight that there were probably many business owners who wanted to make money, build a successful business but also stay nimble in their ability to work they love on a schedule that worked for them. I figured that they would probably want support from someone to do the type of work that they didn’t really enjoy so they could get back to the work they cared about or away from their computer entirely, back the people they cared about.
The examination of tradeoffs go beyond just how much we work for how much money and so forth. Take the example of using AI to fully write your blog content. You get time back, probably an SEO bump. But the trade-off might be your voice, your relationship with your audience, the thing that actually makes your content yours. More productive? Sure. Worth it? That depends entirely on what you're optimizing for.
Getting clear on trade-offs doesn't make the decisions easier, but it matters enormously for how you feel about their impact.
Shift 4: Asking these questions takes privilege and courage
Getting to ask questions like "what do I really want to optimize for" and "what trade-offs feel worth it to me" is a luxury. There are a lot of people just trying to make ends meet, navigating systems that weren't built to help them win, who don't have the bandwidth to examine their relationship with productivity as a philosophical exercise. If that's where you are right now, none of what's above is a judgment. This kind of examination requires a baseline of stability that not everyone has access to, and I’m aware of my own privelege even to do this type of thinking.
And if you do have that stability? Questioning the productivity framework still means going against something a lot of people around you are fully bought into. I found that out when I started having conversations about how I was thinking about my career. Some people just didn't get it. There were uncomfortable moments of feeling misunderstood by people whose opinions I cared about, of having to sit with the friction of seeing things differently and not being able to fully explain it in a way that landed.
That's part of the deal. Going against the norm in anything takes a little bravery. This particular conversation is one of those things. The bill of goods we've all been sold is deeply embedded, and deciding to question it means accepting that not everyone around you is going to be on the same page right away, maybe ever.
So if you're sitting with these questions and feeling like the odd one out for even asking them, you're not. And we're glad you're here.
Frequently asked questions
Does this mean productivity doesn't matter?
Not at all. This isn't an argument for doing less. It's an argument for being more intentional about what you're doing and why. Some people will look at their trade-offs and decide their current setup is exactly right for them. Others will realize they've been pointed in the wrong direction entirely. The point is getting to a conscious choice instead of running on autopilot.
What should I actually be optimizing for instead?
That's going to look different for everyone, which is kind of the point. For some people it's time with family. For others it's creative freedom, financial stability, impact, flexibility. The work is figuring out your own list and then checking honestly whether what you're doing day-to-day actually reflects it.
I'm a business owner. Is this relevant to how I run my business?
Yes, more than you might think. How you think about productivity shapes every systems and operations decision you make. If you're building out automations, implementing new tools, or restructuring how you work, the trade-off question applies to every one of those decisions. A system that saves you time but costs you quality or connection with your audience isn't automatically a win. Strategy has to come before systems, and your values are the foundation of your strategy. Getting clear on what you're actually optimizing for makes every downstream decision easier.
Why does this feel harder to talk about than regular productivity advice?
Because regular productivity advice works within the existing framework. This conversation is about questioning the framework, which makes people uncomfortable, including people you might be close to who have a different relationship with work. That discomfort is normal. It doesn't mean you're asking the wrong questions.
Where do I even start?
Start noticing where your inputs and outputs feel misaligned, not just in volume but in meaning. What are you doing a lot of that doesn't feel worth the trade-off? What would you stop doing tomorrow if it were genuinely up to you? What do you keep telling yourself you'll reassess "when things slow down" that never actually gets reassessed? Those are usually the places worth sitting with. That's typically where the real conversation begins.
